REFLECTION: Who is in Charge of The Future of The Internet?

Peace Be Unto Those Who Follow Right Guidance.

I’m currently reading a paper entitled “Bottom of the Data Pyramid: Big Data and the Global South” (2016) by non-white / Indian female, Payal Arora, Associate Professor, Department of Media & Communication Faculty of History, Culture and Communication at Erasmus University Rotterdam. The paper is available (in PDF format) here.

On her blog, The 3L Mantra to live by! A mashup of Labor, Leisure & Learning, Arora describes herself as follows:

Payal Arora - About Me.jpg

Suffice to say, I was not too impressed with this rather auto-Orientalising self-description, nor with the following TED presentation she delivered:

Interested and discerning Counter-Racist / decolonial viewers are invited to consider:

  1. how she frames the relation between the non-white / non-Western ‘periphery’ and the white / Western ‘core’ of the modern/colonial world system of global White Supremacy (Racism) in terms of ‘the poor’ and ‘the rich’, i.e. in race-less / de-raced / un-raced economistic terms.
  2. how she assimilates peripheral / Oriental behaviours to (tacitly universalised) core / Occidental behaviours by first talking about the history of ‘leisure’ in a (19th Century) European / Western class-based context, and then projecting categories (leisure and labour) from the core to the periphery on the post-colonial (sic) basis that “they are like us”. Who is this us that this non-white female is associating herself (and other non-white people) with / assimilating herself (and other non-white) to?

While it might appear that such a move is intended to overcome a legacy of colonial ‘othering’ which sees ‘them’ as essentially different to ‘us’, it is important to appreciate that this is being attempted by appealing to Eurocentric / West-centric norms. In short, her project is one of (neo)liberal inclusion within (covertly racialised yet overtly race-less) capitalist logics.

I would suggest that Arora’s discourse is postcolonial rather than decolonial, being economistically-framed in terms of inclusive capitalism. She completely fails to understand the intrinsically racialised nature of capitalist logics of accumulation, something that the late black Marxist scholar Cedric Robinson discussed in detail, as have critical race and decolonial scholars more recently.

Ultimately, while Arora’s critique of Big Data / datafication is useful, it is limited, and as to the question ‘Who is in Charge of The Future of The Internet?’, does that question really need to be asked?



The White Man’s Burden 2.0

Peace Be Unto Those Who Follow Right Guidance.

Check out this summary of the Racism (White Supremacy) associated with of ICT4D (Information and Communication technology For Development [=Devil-Ape-ment]):

One Laptop Per Child


The Unbearable Whiteness of ICT4D

Peace Be Unto Those Who Follow Right Guidance.

The July 30 2010 edition of The C.O.W.S. (Context of White Supremacy) radio show on Blog Talk radio featured Jan Nederveen Pieterse, white Mellichamp Professor of global studies and sociology in the Global and International Studies Program at the University of California, Santa Barbara. (An audio recording in MP3 format is available here.)

Although I have yet to listen to the show, I did a little Googling on Pieterse and visited his website where I came across the following article which I should like to share with those readers interested in how the globally operating system of White Supremacy (Racism), which cloaks itself as ‘capitalism’, has been REFINED in the so-called “digital era”.

Digital Capitalism and Development: the Unbearable Lightness of ICT4D *

Consider its content with specific reference to the major area of people activity called Economics.

* ICT4D is shorthand for “information and communication technologies for development”.